文献类型：期刊文章

作　　者：苏振华[1] 郁建兴[2]

机构地区：[1]浙江大学经济学院 [2]中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所

出　　处：《哲学研究》

年　　份：2005

期　　号：11

起止页码：63-69

语　　种：中文

收录情况：BDHX、BDHX2004、CSSCI、CSSCI2004_2005、NSSD、RCCSE、RWSKHX、SKJJZZ、ZGKJHX、核心刊

摘　　要：The public interests should be the way achieving the individual benefits. In Rousseau’s theory, the public opinion is one kind of highly unsurpassed values. According to the Arrow Impossibility theorem, when each individual’s value criterion is emphasized, the absolute public interests will never exist. At the same time, the public choice theory proved that the public interests would be confirmed by the procedures, if these choice procedures are under certain rules. Habermas emphasized that the validity of public opinon must come from the wide participation by citizens. And only the inter-subjective consensus through widespread discussions in the public domain would be the legitimate public interests. The common part between Habermas and Rousseau is that they both emphasized the citizen participation in the origin of the political legitimacy; what is different, Habermas emphasized necessity of procedure in achieving inter-subjective consensus among citizens. The common part between Habermas’ theory and the public choice theory is that they both emphasized the principle of procedure legitimacy; the difference is that Habermas’ theory emphasized the continued political participation by citizens in the public domain. In the realistic political process, when the public interests are implemented, it is necessary to follow the legitimate procedures, respect the mutual recognition and compensate the victimized individuals.

关 键 词：公众参与 程序正当性 主体间共识  公共利益 政府管理 价值原则  民族融合

分 类 号：C914[经济学类]